Synival wrote:what I would like are scores that look and feel nice, and are nicely bound
Oh yes, I've almost forgotten how that feels ...
Obviously I'm used too much to first flying then taped sheets of paper, aching for the ultimate, eye-friendly e-paper reading device
Carolus wrote:2. It is always to you advantage to have a nicely engraved score. Not everyone who buys a copy of Finale or Sibelius is a music engraver, either.
That's true. But as I know, unless you are famous enough to be worth it, so to speak, your publisher won't bear the costs of retypesetting your scores. If the publisher has a unique style, you'll get a check list for formatting, special libraries, and fonts for your typesetting program (Finale or Sibelius, but also Lilypond as I've seen), so you can either do it yourself or pay someone who does it for you. On the other hand, there could always be other kinds of publishers. Maybe it's the best to just ask, head on
For a composer, I think, it would be convenient to develop a usable handwriting and to find his own style of notation that way. Then, using a computer program with a lot of automatic features would in another way "automatically" result in readible scores.
Carolus, thank you for the Juergen Hoeflich tip. Might be useful for future projects
