Hi,
I want to publish a performance edition (a new typesetting or re-engraving) of Telemann's keyboard fantasias TWV 33. IMSLP publish a public domain score here.
I don't want to make money from the project, beyond covering reasonable costs, and want it to be as freely available as the IMSLP score. I also want to make clear on the score where it comes from (IMSLP) and to pass on to those using it the same copyright obligations (or as close as I can get) which come with the IMSLP score. I'd also like to upload it to IMSLP.
I apologise - these question must have come up before - but what form of words should I use on the score to cover copyright? I assume IMSLP would want "cc by 3.0". Is that assumption correct? Do I need to write formally to IMSLP seeking permission to publish this public domain work owned by you? I'm quite happy to do that.
This is my first publication and I want to get it right, hence this post. All advice gratefully received.
Phil
Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
Moderator: Copyright Reviewers
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:01 pm
- notabot: YES
- notabot2: Bot
- Location: U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
Go ahead - even if we wanted to, we can't stop you legally, as it's public domain.
Formerly known as "perlnerd666"
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:32 pm
- notabot: 42
- notabot2: Human
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
Re: Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
Thank you. What copyright wording should I use?
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:01 pm
- notabot: YES
- notabot2: Bot
- Location: U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
OK, so on IMSLP, use whichever Creative Commons license works for you. If you want to publish it for money, you can just use the standard (c) 2009, etc. mumbo-jumbo.
Formerly known as "perlnerd666"
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:32 pm
- notabot: 42
- notabot2: Human
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
Re: Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
That's great. Thanks again.
-
- forum adept
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:00 am
- notabot: YES
- notabot2: Bot
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- Contact:
Re: Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
The score on IMSLP is not protected by copyright any more, there are absolutely no restrictions here. (That's what IMSLP is all about: Works of composers dead more then 70 don't have any protection any more and can be freely copied/distributed/edited, etc.)Philidor wrote:I don't want to make money from the project, beyond covering reasonable costs, and want it to be as freely available as the IMSLP score. I also want to make clear on the score where it comes from (IMSLP) and to pass on to those using it the same copyright obligations (or as close as I can get) which come with the IMSLP score. I'd also like to upload it to IMSLP.
For uploading to IMSLP, using some CreativeCommons license would probably the best.
This public domain work is NOT owned by IMSLP, in fact it is not owned by anyone any more, thus "*Public* domain". There is no requirement to attribute IMSLP, but of course a link is always nice and helps spread word about IMSLP...Philidor wrote:I apologise - these question must have come up before - but what form of words should I use on the score to cover copyright? I assume IMSLP would want "cc by 3.0". Is that assumption correct? Do I need to write formally to IMSLP seeking permission to publish this public domain work owned by you? I'm quite happy to do that.
Cheers,
Reinhold
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:32 pm
- notabot: 42
- notabot2: Human
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
Re: Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
reinhold,
Thanks for your help.
Phil
Thanks for your help.
Point taken. I was thinking of the code on your servers. That's owned by you. So you own the code but don't own the thing it represents! It gets still more complex if you're renting servers... Unless (when people upload to IMSLP) they're just lending you their code? I've not read the TOS.reinhold wrote:This public domain work is NOT owned by IMSLP, in fact it is not owned by anyone any more, thus "*Public* domain". There is no requirement to attribute IMSLP, but of course a link is always nice and helps spread word about IMSLP...
Phil
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:01 pm
- notabot: YES
- notabot2: Bot
- Location: U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
Well, the PDFs themselves are not copyrightable, because of the status of the work (yes, it's "code," but not really).
So you can do whatever - the PDFs are just images of public domain sources, and not copyrightable in and of themselves.
So you can do whatever - the PDFs are just images of public domain sources, and not copyrightable in and of themselves.
Formerly known as "perlnerd666"
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:32 pm
- notabot: 42
- notabot2: Human
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
Re: Publishing a re-engraving of an IMSLP score
That gets to the root imo of the confusion in the heads of some librarians I've read about on other threads. They think because their library owns a public domain music manuscript they have the right to regulate what can be done with it. It's an aspect of capitalism if you like: it's drummed into people's heads very hard that ownership confers extensive rights which can be enforced.perlnerd666 wrote:Well, the PDFs themselves are not copyrightable, because of the status of the work (yes, it's "code," but not really).
So you can do whatever - the PDFs are just images of public domain sources, and not copyrightable in and of themselves.
The first eight re-engraved fantasias are online here. I'll upload to IMSLP in batches over the next few weeks. I can't praise IMSLP highly enough and thank you very much for your help on this thread.