data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e631/0e631281064ee9dd4bec208e1ee29e2614f5fe04" alt="Mad :x"
For the people that don't like me using the word overrated, let's please don't bring that up because that is distracting from the real issue.
Regards
Moderator: kcleung
Probably the range (the quality is similar, mainly in the range, not timbre IMO), also Viola is more convention e.g. string quartet.Another question, what is the reason behind composers wanting to write alternate parts for the viola for pieces that were originally composed for the clarinet (e.g. Brahms and Reger). Is it because of the mutual qualities of timbre that both instruments share?
Speaking of Concertante, didn't Mozart use Scordatura to make the Viola sound more like a Violin (or at least to make it 'fit' more comfortably with the Violin)?Well the viola does have a lot of concertante pieces out there, there are just not well known. For instance, Carl Maria von Weber wrote a couple of concertante works for the viola, and I have not seen one recording of them.
Any word that is used so frequently will tire, but (and please don't take this personally) the use of this one can be seen as arrogant, in that it can look like anything you don't happen to like is overrated. It doesn't have to come across this way, especially if used sparingly, but certainly some of the highly emotional responses (not just one person's) in another thread kind of started going that way.allegroamabile wrote:To Yagan: I bet if I named this thread "Violincello Problems" or something along those lines you would not have a problem with it. I do not know why people cannot stand me using the word overrated.
Mozarts Sinfonia Concertante, K.364 - for violin and viola - was written in E flat Major. But the Viola part was written in D. The violist has to tune up the strings 1/2 step higher and play it as if it was in D... but it actually sounds in E flat. Many Violists nowadays just play it with normal tuning and in E flat. You can find both versions (Viola part written in D and in E flat) on this site.]Speaking of Concertante, didn't Mozart use Scordatura to make the Viola sound more like a Violin (or at least to make it 'fit' more comfortably with the Violin)?
I do not want to appear arrogant, sorry if it has seemed that way. I am just an excessively emotional and sensitive person and that can get in the way of how I truly look upon something.steltz wrote:Any word that is used so frequently will tire, but (and please don't take this personally) the use of this one can be seen as arrogant
I know 'what' I was asking 'why'. The tuning changed the timbre, or tone of the Viola, it's my understanding he changed it to make it sound more like a Violin, just getting clarification.Mozarts Sinfonia Concertante, K.364 - for violin and viola - was written in E flat Major. But the Viola part was written in D. The violist has to tune up the strings 1/2 step higher and play it as if it was in D... but it actually sounds in E flat. Many Violists nowadays just play it with normal tuning and in E flat. You can find both versions (Viola part written in D and in E flat) on this site.
The word "overrated" is definitely overused.KGill wrote:There you go, overused- not overrated...