Main Page
Moderator: kcleung
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:55 am
Unfortunately does not work I guess that sort of makes sense (URLs would be all over the place if this happened). Maybe we can start with internationalizing just the text, and then we can do the page internationalization later when we know how best to do it. We can hack together something right now with the IFLANG parameter and the inclusion of different language translations of the entire page (via {{:Page}}) on a Community Portal "meta-page", but the title would still not be internationalized...
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:55 am
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:55 am
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:55 am
Excellent. Could you please add portal-url, too? It's not urgent, since the new portal has not yet been translated, and the old one (of which some translation exists) should rather not be linked from the sidebar (little useful content).
At some point we may also want to translate the two "browse by" pages, but at the moment no translation exists to my knowledge.
If you set up a donation system, you may also want to add sitesupport-url.
As for the sidebar structure, I like the division into "navigation" and "participate" that is used e.g. on commons.wikimedia.org. The problem is, the content of the "browse by" box of the IMSLP sidebar would not be very clear without that heading, so it would probably not be a good idea to move those links as they are to the "navigation" box. Thoughts, anyone?
At some point we may also want to translate the two "browse by" pages, but at the moment no translation exists to my knowledge.
If you set up a donation system, you may also want to add sitesupport-url.
As for the sidebar structure, I like the division into "navigation" and "participate" that is used e.g. on commons.wikimedia.org. The problem is, the content of the "browse by" box of the IMSLP sidebar would not be very clear without that heading, so it would probably not be a good idea to move those links as they are to the "navigation" box. Thoughts, anyone?
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:55 am
Could be an idea... so we would have something like (don't mind the exact wording):imslp wrote:How about you just split the navigation into "browse scores by" and non-"browse scores by", and then add participate below those two?
*navigation
**main page
**random page
**donate
*browse scores
**composer name
**composer period
**work genre
**work period
*participate
**community portal
**forums
**RC
**help
The silly toy function "random page" gets a rather too prominent position, but otherwise it looks fine to me... what do you think?
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:55 am
Hmm... if the page is about contribution, then "Contributor's Portal" may be a good idea We can then set up a "User's Portal" or something... I've started a "Welcome Page" a long time ago but never got around to finishing it, but maybe something similar can be put for users (it currently also sounds way too much like a commercial): http://imslp.org/wiki/Welcome_PageLeonard Vertighel wrote:I think I'll make the change shortly. By the way, would "Contributors Portal" (or would it have to be "Contributors' Portal"?) be clearer, or would it sound silly?imslp wrote:It looks nice
The idea is to list ways in which IMSLP can be useful to different people (I'm here mainly thinking of universities and professors, since the use of IMSLP to other people is more obvious); I think it would be great for IMSLP if some university library would collaborate with IMSLP, but for that sake we must first attract them and show them how useful IMSLP can be
Fine!Who said that silly toys are a bad thing?imslp wrote:But hey! Don't speak so badly about Random Page
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:55 am
Ah, so both my guesses were wrong, you don't use the plural in this case. Probably much of what I write in English sounds awkward... feel free to fix whatever weird wordings I produce.imslp wrote:Hmm... if the page is about contribution, then "Contributor's Portal" may be a good idea
Well I've mentioned myself the idea of a User's Portal before (though maybe I called it something different)... We can start a draft and see how it turns out (maybe also start a new forum thread). Not sure what else you could write in the Welcome Page though...imslp wrote:We can then set up a "User's Portal" or something... I've started a "Welcome Page" a long time ago but never got around to finishing it, but maybe something similar can be put for users (it currently also sounds way too much like a commercial): http://imslp.org/wiki/Welcome_Page
The idea is to list ways in which IMSLP can be useful to different people (I'm here mainly thinking of universities and professors, since the use of IMSLP to other people is more obvious); I think it would be great for IMSLP if some university library would collaborate with IMSLP, but for that sake we must first attract them and show them how useful IMSLP can be
What kind of collaboration are you thinking of with the university libraries?
Actually... I didn't notice that at all haha. Speaking of which, I'm undecided between "Contributor's Portal" and "Contributor Portal"... the "'s" just seems weird to me for some reason... anyone else care to weigh in on this?Leonard Vertighel wrote:Ah, so both my guesses were wrong, you don't use the plural in this case. Probably much of what I write in English sounds awkward... feel free to fix whatever weird wordings I produce.imslp wrote:Hmm... if the page is about contribution, then "Contributor's Portal" may be a good idea
Well, I actually was writing about this to one librarian... one of my (grand? or overly grand? ) ideas is that IMSLP may become a sort of a hub for university score libraries. See, there are many relatively small music libraries around the world, and even though they are small, if a few of them will share scans of scores with everyone else, it'd both be a good thing for them (now they have access to the scores of other music libraries around the world), and the IMSLP (of course).Well I've mentioned myself the idea of a User's Portal before (though maybe I called it something different)... We can start a draft and see how it turns out (maybe also start a new forum thread). Not sure what else you could write in the Welcome Page though...imslp wrote:We can then set up a "User's Portal" or something... I've started a "Welcome Page" a long time ago but never got around to finishing it, but maybe something similar can be put for users (it currently also sounds way too much like a commercial): http://imslp.org/wiki/Welcome_Page
The idea is to list ways in which IMSLP can be useful to different people (I'm here mainly thinking of universities and professors, since the use of IMSLP to other people is more obvious); I think it would be great for IMSLP if some university library would collaborate with IMSLP, but for that sake we must first attract them and show them how useful IMSLP can be
What kind of collaboration are you thinking of with the university libraries?
No idea how practical this is, or whether its just daydreaming, but hey... nothing tried nothing gained In any case, I believe that it will be possible to attract individual professors to sharing scores online, which is a good thing not only because there will be more people contributing (and high quality submissions too... I hope), but also because there will be more expertise in music, which is always a good thing for IMSLP imo. This is of course not in any way saying that current contributors are unknowledgable, but just that some insider musicology knowledge (not that I have much of that myself, which I don't) may be useful in some cases