understanding the reprint copyright of parts etc
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:19 am
Hi to the Forum,
I've recently being downloading a lot of the Bach Bach-Gesellschaft Ausgabe scores which are definitely Public Domain, I've been importing these into Nueratron Photoscore, and editing, and then sending to Sibelius to edit further, to make scores to playback so I can listen and hear the orchestration and study etc.
However, there are times where I've seen a publisher has published parts of a previously public domain score as a "reprint". If I use these pdf's that are reprinted [some as late as in the 1970's] because they are scans of earlier public domain scores, are they still in the public domain? I know it says they are PD, but how do you really know? What is the law about this? It's just that some of these parts are much "clearer: in quality making it easier for photoscore to read them and edit them as they have fewer mistakes in the reading due to their quality and the largeness of the notes in comparison to a full orchestral or miniature score. It would be great to use these but I just want to make sure my conscience is clear in doing so.
As for the Bach-Gesellschaft Ausgabe scores, there is a lot of typeset scores with creative licences such as 3 or 4.0 etc, of the same scores where the licence permits you to use and re-adapt the score. I'm not interested in using any of these for commercial use, but they'd be easier to use in Photoscore due to their typesetting, as they would be read very fast.
However, if I "learn" something great from these scores now playing back in my Sibelius notation program, and use ideas from them for my own orchestrations and compositions, do I have to acknowledge somehow, if I publish a composition, that my skills were due to my use of these particular creative commons licence scores in my study? I suppose it would be like Beethoven acknowledging on the front of his scores that he learned such and such skills from studying and making reductions etc of a Mozart opera etc.
I'm not using their actual typeset scores by readapting them, but using them as a learning tool. I just thought I would ask as I find these creative common licences a little confusing if they are not Creative commons Zero licences [or public domain as they say].
I also have some scores now playing back in my notation programs really well with Noteperformer 3. Would imslp be interested in me submitting any of these scores as .sib or .xml files for people to download and use?
thanks,
Steve Martin
Australia
I've recently being downloading a lot of the Bach Bach-Gesellschaft Ausgabe scores which are definitely Public Domain, I've been importing these into Nueratron Photoscore, and editing, and then sending to Sibelius to edit further, to make scores to playback so I can listen and hear the orchestration and study etc.
However, there are times where I've seen a publisher has published parts of a previously public domain score as a "reprint". If I use these pdf's that are reprinted [some as late as in the 1970's] because they are scans of earlier public domain scores, are they still in the public domain? I know it says they are PD, but how do you really know? What is the law about this? It's just that some of these parts are much "clearer: in quality making it easier for photoscore to read them and edit them as they have fewer mistakes in the reading due to their quality and the largeness of the notes in comparison to a full orchestral or miniature score. It would be great to use these but I just want to make sure my conscience is clear in doing so.
As for the Bach-Gesellschaft Ausgabe scores, there is a lot of typeset scores with creative licences such as 3 or 4.0 etc, of the same scores where the licence permits you to use and re-adapt the score. I'm not interested in using any of these for commercial use, but they'd be easier to use in Photoscore due to their typesetting, as they would be read very fast.
However, if I "learn" something great from these scores now playing back in my Sibelius notation program, and use ideas from them for my own orchestrations and compositions, do I have to acknowledge somehow, if I publish a composition, that my skills were due to my use of these particular creative commons licence scores in my study? I suppose it would be like Beethoven acknowledging on the front of his scores that he learned such and such skills from studying and making reductions etc of a Mozart opera etc.
I'm not using their actual typeset scores by readapting them, but using them as a learning tool. I just thought I would ask as I find these creative common licences a little confusing if they are not Creative commons Zero licences [or public domain as they say].
I also have some scores now playing back in my notation programs really well with Noteperformer 3. Would imslp be interested in me submitting any of these scores as .sib or .xml files for people to download and use?
thanks,
Steve Martin
Australia