"By a 6-to-2 vote, the justices rejected arguments based on the First Amendment and the Constitution’s copyright clause, saying that the public domain was not “a category of constitutional significance” and that copyright protections might be expanded even if they did not create incentives for new works to be created."
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/19/busin ... .html?_r=1
Well, I can't say I'm surprised, though it's still a huge disappointment
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
What will this mean for IMSLP? Will we have to reexamine our policies on US tagging of items published after 1922 that have fallen out of copyright?