IMSLP Forums

Even though we have this list, I'm still going through each one to make sure it's not already uploaded in a different format and I'm adding the Sibley tag on the ones that were missing it yet already uploaded so that eventually we'll have a complete list.

@Carolus: Good to know. It looks like there are only a few hundred Sibley pieces that are in our system but not tagged so (less than 10% of total Sibley links) so we shouldn't run into a huge amount of conflict. Unless they used the exact same name I don't have an easy way to find out which pieces w...

I permanently removed the bad links so I don't have a way to get those back without starting over.

i have 4000 titles now (2000 of which were filtered earlier today). I'll just generate the full list of titles first before i start filtering it so I can send it to you sooner. I'll also have to go back and generate titles for the first 4000 that are already posted because I hadn't designed the titl...

I have it generate 1000 titles and then I go over them while it works on the next 1000, so I don't have a full list of all the titles yet. If you want a batch of 1000 filtered links with titles to play around with I can send those to you. I'll send you the full list once it finishes either way.

I just sent you the link list, but did you want the version with some of the titles next to the links? I have 2000 with titles since i started using that method.

I've got a program now that automatically fetches the page titles of the Sibley links and reports it next to the sibley link (which is what Rochester should have done on their webiste) which has made it much faster for me to filter the bad links (and scholarly papers and gravestones) from my list of...

I couldn't get your suggestion to show up in the preview so I've left them as is. Adding the " " and removing "http://" caused the link to be written out as text and then separately linked next to itself and written out in full, which looked weird. And I couldn't get a \r to work...

page is up and linked from Sibley Project page. I think we should get rid of the composer list section as it isn't necessary now that we can track all the links that are outstanding. What do other people think?

http://imslp.org/wiki/IMSLP:Sibley_Mirr ... :Link_List

hooray! i have a MOVE tab now so I should be able to put it up on a page! I just didn't want to add it to the current sibley page as it is very long. I'll break it into a few different pages for ease of editing when people need to delete links after uploading. I can wikify it in excel so no worries.

I just used the imslp's search function and a bunch of filtering in excel to compile the list. Then another script to convert the data into links. I don't know how to write the code to set it up in real-time to check. I thought for now it would be a good idea to just make a few wiki pages of the lin...

I should have added that the point of doing it in this format is so that people can remove the links as they finish them, but I only takes a few seconds to repopulate the list in case someone forgets to delete a link.

So I came up with a system to produce all the Sibley links to files that have not yet been uploaded. There are the odd exception for files that were uploaded without the 1802.xxxxx tag, but these are few and far between. Also, a small percentage are used for non-music scores but the vast majority ar...

awesome. It's a bit time consuming but I'll get them up eventually. I hope I'm the last person who ever has to pay for those parts. Especially when "editing" means putting Carrots over every single 16th note. Thanks editor.

It claims to be a critical edition, but all that is there except for notes are a handful of dynamic markings, cresc. labels, and unnecessary articulations over a lot of notes. I have a couple different editions so if I went through and made my own editions to the piece couldn't i publish that myself...